On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:44:31AM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > > One has to use git-stash rather than "git stash". Oversight? > > This looks like an incorrect installation, with git-stash in your > $PATH, but not in the place git looks for its commands (I don't > remember the exact mechanism). On a related note, is it just me, or is the following comment and related code in git.c (introduced by Linus in 231af832) totally bogus: /* * We search for git commands in the following order: * - git_exec_path() * - the path of the "git" command if we could find it * in $0 * - the regular PATH. */ We never actually look in the regular PATH since we call execv_git_cmd (although we do still munge the PATH, apparently so shell scripts can use git-foo syntax; see 77cb17e9). This means you can't drop "git-foo" into your PATH and have it work as "git foo". What is the desired behavior? -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
