[PATCH] config.mak.dev: re-enable -Wformat-zero-length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:25:30PM +0000, Ralf Thielow via GitGitGadget wrote:

> Fixes the following warnings:
> 
> rebase-interactive.c: In function ‘edit_todo_list’:
> rebase-interactive.c:137:38: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length]
>     write_file(rebase_path_dropped(), "");
> rebase-interactive.c:144:37: warning: zero-length gnu_printf format string [-Wformat-zero-length]
>    write_file(rebase_path_dropped(), "");

Thanks, I think this is worth doing.

I had noticed them, too, but then they "went away" so I assumed they had
already been fixed. It turns out that it's the difference between a
build with and without the DEVELOPER Makefile knob set.

I think we should do this on top:

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] config.mak.dev: re-enable -Wformat-zero-length

We recently triggered some -Wformat-zero-length warnings in the code,
but no developers noticed because we suppress that warning in builds
with the DEVELOPER=1 Makefile knob set. But we _don't_ suppress them in
a non-developer build (and they're part of -Wall). So even though
non-developers probably aren't using -Werror, they see the annoying
warnings when they build.

We've had back and forth discussion over the years on whether this
warning is useful or not. In most cases we've seen, it's not true that
the call is a mistake, since we're using its side effects (like adding a
newline status_printf_ln()) or writing an empty string to a destination
which is handled by the function (as in write_file()). And so we end up
working around it in the source by passing ("%s", "").

There's more discussion in the subthread starting at:

  https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqtwaod7ly.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

The short of it is that we probably can't just disable the warning for
everybody because of portability issues. And ignoring it for developers
puts us in the situation we're in now, where non-dev builds are annoyed.

Since the workaround is both rarely needed and fairly straight-forward,
let's just commit to doing it as necessary, and re-enable the warning.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
I had totally forgotten about that thread until researching the history
just now. There's another option there involving #pragma, but it was too
gross for me to even suggest now as an alternative in the commit
message. ;) I think this is the most practical improvement.

 config.mak.dev | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/config.mak.dev b/config.mak.dev
index bf1f3fcdee..89b218d11a 100644
--- a/config.mak.dev
+++ b/config.mak.dev
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ endif
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wall
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wdeclaration-after-statement
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wformat-security
-DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wno-format-zero-length
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wold-style-definition
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Woverflow
 DEVELOPER_CFLAGS += -Wpointer-arith
-- 
2.25.1.911.g022f5304bc




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux