Heba Waly <heba.waly@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > variable. On the other hand, I understand that you'd prefer to skip > the extra step of converting the enum to string. > hmmm ok, I'll change the enum and send a new version soon. To avoid misunderstanding, I do not object to enum based approach at all. In fact, I'd rather prefer it over bunch of const strings that can be checked by the compiler. What I do not prefer compared to either of these approaches is to accept enum from the caller and convert it to string to consult config API every time, which is worse than "bunch of const strings". Thanks.
