On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Matthew L Foster wrote: > > > but if git did what you wanted it would show every commit with the time of > > the merge, and that wouldn't help you anyway. > > Actually that is exactly what I want. I want to know what local time change X and Y (and all > changes) were merged locally. You misunderstand. It would do so both for the newly merged commits *and* for the old commits. Because _you_ think the "new" commits got merged, but it's logically exactly equivalent to saying that the *old* commits got merged. So now *every* single commit would get the timestamp of the merge. See? It would be pointless. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
