"Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] t5509: initialized `pushee` as bare repository s/initialized/initialize/ at least, perhaps. Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] t5509: use a bare repository for test push target may be easier to understand, though. Then the first paragraph of the body of the proposed message, which gives an excellent description of how the current tests rely on a bug that we plan to fix in a later step of the series, explains why we do not want to push into a non-bare repository. > `receive.denyCurrentBranch` currently has a bug where it allows pushing > into non-bare repository using namespaces as long as it does not have any > commits. This would cause t5509 to fail once that bug is fixed because it > pushes into an unborn current branch. And then you give a good description why not just it is safe, but it makes more sense. Very well explained. > In t5509, no operations are performed inside `pushee`, as it is only a > target for `git push` and `git ls-remote` calls. Therefore it does not > need to have a worktree. So, it is safe to change `pushee` to a bare > repository. > > Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > t/t5509-fetch-push-namespaces.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/t/t5509-fetch-push-namespaces.sh b/t/t5509-fetch-push-namespaces.sh > index 75cbfcc392c..e3975bd21de 100755 > --- a/t/t5509-fetch-push-namespaces.sh > +++ b/t/t5509-fetch-push-namespaces.sh > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test_expect_success setup ' > ) && > commit0=$(cd original && git rev-parse HEAD^) && > commit1=$(cd original && git rev-parse HEAD) && > - git init pushee && > + git init --bare pushee && > git init puller > '
