Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] diff: halt tree-diff early after max_changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/16/2020 7:00 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Use this max_changes option in the bloom filter calculations. This
>> reduces the time taken to compute the filters for the Linux kernel
>> repo from 2m50s to 2m35s. On a large internal repository with ~500
>> commits that perform tree-wide changes, the time reduced from
>> 6m15s to 3m48s.
> 
> I wonder if there is some large open-source project with many commits
> performing tree-wide changes, that is with many commits with more than
> 512 changed files with respect to the first parent.
> 
> Maybe https://github.com/whosonfirst-data/whosonfirst-data-venue-us-ny
> from "Top Ten Worst Repositories to host on GitHub - Git Merge 2017"
> could be a good repository to test ;-)
> 

Thanks for the suggestion! I will see if any of these repos gives us a 
good test bed and add the perf improvement numbers in the appropriate
commit messages in v3. 

Cheers! 
Garima Singh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux