Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2020, #04; Mon, 17)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 02:08:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> * tb/commit-graph-split-merge (2020-02-12) 3 commits
> >>  - builtin/commit-graph.c: support '--input=none'
> >>  - builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce '--input=<source>'
> >>  - builtin/commit-graph.c: support '--split[=<strategy>]'
> >>
> >>  The code to write out the commit-graph has been taught a few
> >>  options to control if the resulting graph chains should be merged
> >>  or a single new incremental graph is created.
> >>
> >>  Waiting for the discussion to settle.
> >>  cf. <20200212205028.GE4364@syl.local>
> >
> > I think that this discussion is still "settling", although the thread
> > hasn't had any activity for a few days now.
> >
> > I wanted to get feedback from my response to Eric Sunshine before saying
> > that we have consensus, but otherwise I think this is moving along.
>
> Did you mean Szeder?

I did, whoops. Thanks for noticing (and sorry to Eric, who I see has
responded just above :-)).

> https://lore.kernel.org/git/cover.1581486293.git.me@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux