Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: Adapting strbuf_* functions
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Subject
: Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: Adapting strbuf_* functions
From
: Robear Selwans <rwagih.rw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 16:42:34 +0200
Cc
: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx>, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>, Pratik Karki <predatoramigo@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <CAHk66fskrfcJ0YFDhfimVBTJZB4um7r=GdQuM8heJdZtF8D7UQ@mail.gmail.com>
References
: <CAHk66fskrfcJ0YFDhfimVBTJZB4um7r=GdQuM8heJdZtF8D7UQ@mail.gmail.com>
All what you said makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the help.
References
:
Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: Adapting strbuf_* functions
From:
Abhishek Kumar
Prev by Date:
Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 1/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: a new way to initialize strbuf
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH] t3424: new rebase testcase documenting a stat-dirty-like failure
Previous by thread:
Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: Adapting strbuf_* functions
Next by thread:
Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: Adapting strbuf_* functions
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Gcc Help]
[IETF Annouce]
[DCCP]
[Netdev]
[Networking]
[Security]
[V4L]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux SCSI]
[Fedora Users]
