Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > + if (revs->count) {
>> > + revs->count_right++;
>> > + return;
>> > + }
>> > +
>>
>> Hmm. This puzzled me at first. Do you think that it could benefit from a
>> comment?
>
> What would it say (i.e., I'm not sure what confused you)?
I think the question reader had was "why *right*?"
