Re: yz/p4-py3, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2020, #03; Wed, 12)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Keene <seraphire@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2/14/2020 12:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ben Keene <seraphire@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On 2/14/2020 12:15 AM, Denton Liu wrote:
>>>> This change comes from 'git-p4: restructure code in submit' in
>>>> 'bk/p4-pre-edit-changelist' which introduced the use of the `<>`
>>>> operator. In Python 2, this is valid but in Python 3, it was removed.
>>>>
>>>> We can simply replace the `<>` with `!=` which is the new way of
>>>> writing "not equals".
>>> Absolutely. I'm committing the change now.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I didn't mean that the use of <> was the only bug in 'pu' wrt Python
>> 3.  I see you sent a new round out, but has it been tested under
>> Python 3 already?  Just checking to set my expectation right.
> I have not been able to test my changes under Py3. Unfortunately I
> don't have the bandwidth at present to incorporate Yang's code into
> this code for testing. I've been having to work with Python 2 at
> present and using my changes locally.  I have tried to not use Python2
> only code, but cross compatible code but I'm not sure what other
> errors might be present.
>
> I'm fine if this needs to stay pending until Yang is complete and
> I can then retest with the new code.

Nah, I'd have replaced and rebuilt 'pu' anyway.  I just wanted to
know how much I should be surprised if I saw any other Python3
issues when Travis sees the updated 'pu' later today.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux