On 2020-02-11 at 16:40:56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I can see a future where we have a different format that allows for > more metadata so we can encode the hash size separately. But maybe > that can be for format v3 and up. > > Let's do format v2 = format v1 but with 32-byte hashes. The way we've preferred to do this in Git is to write a four-byte hash identifier into the file, but we have legacy concerns here, so I think switching to v2 for SHA-256 is fine. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
