Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Changes possibly missing from this version, for discussion: >> >> * I did not remove the --am option as suggested by Phillip, since Junio and >> Phillip were still discussing whether it is wanted/needed. >> * I did not address the last two items Jonathan brought up as I >> couldn't find enough information to reproduce or understand the problems. > > I think I've got a fix for the failure with > --committer-date-is-author-date that Jonathan reported which I'll post > next week - the bug was not in this series, it was just exposed by > it. I'll try and read through this series next week as well. > > Best Wishes Thanks. As to the "--am" option, I do not care too deeply about it anymore, so if there is nothing else that we need to further polish, should we move this forward to 'next' soonish?
