Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] Reftable support for git-core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:05 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   HEAD - convincing enough for old versions to accept
> >   refs/ - a standard rwx directory
> >   reftable/ - a normal directory
> >   reftable-list - the list of tables
> >   reads/heads  - a file containing "this repo uses reftables. Upgrade
> > to git vXYZ"
> >
> > this would prevent people from erroneously creating normal branches.
>
> That seems reasonable. They could still write "refs/tags/foo", etc, but
> presumably branches would be more common.
>..
>
> PS I don't know if it's set in stone yet, but if we're changing things
>    around, is it an option to put reftable-list inside the reftable
>    directory, just to keep the top-level uncluttered?

I put up https://git.eclipse.org/r/c/157167/ to update the spec inside
JGit. Please review.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--
Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux