Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] bisect: libify `check_merge_bases` and its dependents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miriam Rubio <mirucam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> + * - If a merge base must be tested, on success return -11 a special condition

Is this eleven something the original (scripted version) used, or
what this series invented?  If the latter, what was the reason the
value was chosen, and what were the constraints when choosing the
value (e.g. it cannot be used an exit code by something)?

In any case, these values (if there other special codes defined)
should be given symbolic names (either #define or enum).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux