Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify "explicitly given" in push.default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Though I'd still slightly worry that somebody might not consider
> configured refspecs. Saying more clearly "any refspec no matter where it
> comes from" might still be worthwhile. I.e., something like:
>
>   Defines the action `git push` should take if no refspec is given
>   (whether from the command-line, config, or elsewhere).

That's 100x better than to say "explicit" "implicit" etc. and then
have readers guess what the adjectives mean or explain what they
mean in (parentheses).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux