Hi Junio,
On 27.01.20 19:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Peter Kaestle <peter.kaestle@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
We have test coverage for "git submodule status" output in
various cases, i.e.
1) not-init, not-cloned: status should initially be "missing"
2) init, not-cloned: status should be "missing"
3) not-init, cloned:
4) init, cloned:'status should be "up-to-date" after update
4.1) + modified: status should be "modified" after submodule commit
4.2) + modified, committed: status should be "up-to-date" after update
Case 2) will be covered by this patch. Case 3) remains uncovered.
Test that submodule status reports initialized but not cloned
submodules as missing to fill the gap in test coverage.
Thanks for an update.
Sure, welcome. Will you include those patches, or do you need further
refinement?
- Thanks a lot for your guidance and mentoring. It was a pleasure to
learn from you.
--
kind regards,
--peter;
