Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I don't overly care on the implementation either way, since it's now > hidden in the helper. I mostly chose the bit-flip to match the existing > code, but I'd be happy to change it. I don't, either, and as a step in this series, it makes perfect sense to keep the implementation detail the same in the new helper. Making it more readable would be a separate issue. Thanks.
