Matt Rogers <mattr94@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think this was a mess-up on my end. I had meant to rename it to > config_scope_name() (after talking with Bert) but it appears that I > had messed up, so I think my mistake wasn't to rename the function, but > to fail to rename it. So I do apologize. No need to. I just wanted to make sure everybody involved is aware of what others are doing to avoid wasted effort. Now I do expect the (hopefully) final reroll of your topic, so that Bert can fork his topic on top of it. Thanks.
