All steps looked quite sensibly done. > - patch 5 will be replaced by/rebased on Matthew's work in 'config: allow user to > know scope of config options', once 'config_scope_name' is available I expect that Matthew's topic would become solid enough after one more reroll to name the function back to config_scope_name(); after that, let's drop the step and instead fork this topic off of Matthew's topic to queue the remaining patches on top. Thanks.
