On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:13:01AM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > I've mentioned both on list and on #git that one of my production > repositories has a few weird points in time. Some folks have asked > to see at least screenshots of the line part of the gitk output, > as apparently they've never seen ugly history in Git. Lucky them. > > The images are rather large so I have posted them on my website > with a bit longer explanation of each: > > http://www.spearce.org/2007/07/difficult-gitk-graphs.html > OK, no more screenshots from *that* repository! I don't ever want > to run `gitk --all` there again. Ever. Were those graphs generated with --topo-order (the default) or --date-order? I've found complex history usually looks a lot more manageable with --date-order. Certainly the Git history is a LOT less wide with --all --date-order than --all. Does this help your situation as well? -bcd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
