Re: [PATCH v2] fetch: emphasize failure during submodule fetch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> @@ -1280,10 +1280,13 @@ struct submodule_parallel_fetch {
>  	/* Pending fetches by OIDs */
>  	struct fetch_task **oid_fetch_tasks;
>  	int oid_fetch_tasks_nr, oid_fetch_tasks_alloc;
> +
> +	struct strbuf submodules_with_errors;
> +	pthread_mutex_t submodule_errors_mutex;

Hmph, it is kind of surprising that we need a new mutex for this.

Isn't the task_finish handler, which is what accesses the
with_errors field this patch adds, called by pp_collect_finished()
one at a time, is it?

It seems oid_fetch_tasks[] array is also a shared resource in this
structure among the parallel fetch tasks, but there is no protection
against simultaneous access to it.  Am I missing what makes the new
field different?  Somewhat puzzled...

Other than that, I think this is a vast improvement relative to the
initial round.  I wonder if we want to _("i18n/l10n") the message,
though.

Thanks.


>  #define SPF_INIT {0, ARGV_ARRAY_INIT, NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, \
>  		  STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP, \
> -		  NULL, 0, 0}
> +		  NULL, 0, 0, STRBUF_INIT, PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER}
>  
>  static int get_fetch_recurse_config(const struct submodule *submodule,
>  				    struct submodule_parallel_fetch *spf)
> @@ -1547,7 +1550,10 @@ static int fetch_finish(int retvalue, struct strbuf *err,
>  	struct string_list_item *it;
>  	struct oid_array *commits;
>  
> -	if (retvalue)
> +	if (!task || !task->sub)
> +		BUG("callback cookie bogus");
> +
> +	if (retvalue) {
>  		/*
>  		 * NEEDSWORK: This indicates that the overall fetch
>  		 * failed, even though there may be a subsequent fetch
> @@ -1557,8 +1563,11 @@ static int fetch_finish(int retvalue, struct strbuf *err,
>  		 */
>  		spf->result = 1;
>  
> -	if (!task || !task->sub)
> -		BUG("callback cookie bogus");
> +		pthread_mutex_lock(&spf->submodule_errors_mutex);
> +		strbuf_addf(&spf->submodules_with_errors, "\t%s\n",
> +			    task->sub->name);
> +		pthread_mutex_unlock(&spf->submodule_errors_mutex);
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Is this the second time we process this submodule? */
>  	if (task->commits)
> @@ -1627,6 +1636,11 @@ int fetch_populated_submodules(struct repository *r,
>  				   &spf,
>  				   "submodule", "parallel/fetch");
>  
> +	if (spf.submodules_with_errors.len > 0)
> +		fprintf(stderr, "Errors during submodule fetch:\n%s",
> +			spf.submodules_with_errors.buf);
> +
> +
>  	argv_array_clear(&spf.args);
>  out:
>  	free_submodules_oids(&spf.changed_submodule_names);



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux