Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] bugreport: add uname info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 16:43 -0800 12 Dec 2019, Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The contents of uname() can give us some insight into what sort of
system the user is running on, and help us replicate their setup if need
be. The domainname field is not guaranteed to be available, so don't
collect it.

The manpage on Linux says that it's a GNU extension; on Mac OS it isn't mentioned. So it would be more accurate to say that it's known not to be available on many systems rather than just not being guaranteed.

Besides that I think in some cases it may be considered sensitive information, so another reason to not include it. Perhaps even worthy of being mentioned as the primary reason.

+			    uname_info.nodename,

I think in some cases this could also be considered as sensitive information, and is unlikely to help in diagnosing problems. So I'd move to exclude this as well.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux