Re: [PATCH 3/5] Clean up work-tree handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I try to take a closer look at your changes tomorrow evening.  Here
are just two short things I saw while taking a short look at the
patch.

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> +const char *get_git_work_tree(void)
> +{
> +	static int initialized = 0;
> +	if (!initialized) {
> +		work_tree = getenv(GIT_WORK_TREE_ENVIRONMENT);
> +		if (!work_tree) {
> +			work_tree = git_work_tree_cfg;
> +			if (work_tree && !is_absolute_path(work_tree))
> +			work_tree = git_path(work_tree);

A tab is missing here.

> -				fprintf(stderr, "No directory given for --work-tree.\n" );
> +				error("No directory given for --work-tree.\n");

There should probably be no '\n' at the end when the 'error' function
is used.  There are two other calls to fprintf(stderr, <error message>)
next to the one you changed, why did you change this one but not the
other ones?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux