Stephen Oberholtzer <stevie@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> ... a clean, portable way to create a single case statement that
> handles the final condition.
Hmm, don't we want to say (1) original 0 (success) maps to 1 (2)
original 125 maps to 125 (3) anything below 128 in the original maps
to 0 and (4) everything else is left intact? Perhaps something as
simple like this, taking advantage of the fact that $? won't have
anything other than digits?
... do something ...
status=$?
case $status in
0) status=1 ;;
125) : as-is ;;
? | ?? | 1[01]? | 12[0-7]) status=0;;
*) : as-is ;;
esac
I am still unclear where the need for {SUCCESS_FAIL}_TERM magic
comes from, though.
