Re: [PATCH 2/2] rebase: fix saving of --signoff state for am-based rebases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > From: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This was an error introduced in the conversion from shell in commit
> > 21853626eac5 ("built-in rebase: call `git am` directly", 2019-01-18),
> > which was noticed by a random browsing of the code.
>
> Wow, thanks.

Oy. Thanks for fixing my bug,
Dscho

>
> This probably indicates that nobody uses "rebase --signoff" in real
> life (i.e. where correct signed-off-by line matters).  But still the
> bug is worth fixing.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  builtin/rebase.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/rebase.c b/builtin/rebase.c
> > index ddf33bc9d4..e354ec84bb 100644
> > --- a/builtin/rebase.c
> > +++ b/builtin/rebase.c
> > @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static int rebase_write_basic_state(struct rebase_options *opts)
> >  		write_file(state_dir_path("gpg_sign_opt", opts), "%s",
> >  			   opts->gpg_sign_opt);
> >  	if (opts->signoff)
> > -		write_file(state_dir_path("strategy", opts), "--signoff");
> > +		write_file(state_dir_path("signoff", opts), "--signoff");
> >
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux