Hi, On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On 7/26/07, Christian MICHON <christian.michon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/26/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > microperl [1] maybe? I haven't tried it yet. > > > > > > > it won't work. I tried that few months back. > > > > plus the fact you'll still need perl modules. > > > > I just had a look at your gitbox gitweb. Did you really manage > > to get busybox-1.6.1 to work with mingw ? > > Most of tools (that are included) work fine. Ash almost works. It can > run git status, git commit, git clone.. and most of test cases. There > are still some missing pieces and bugs to hunt down though. Thank you for working on this! However, I am not completely convinced that having a builtin shell is all that useful. I for one would like to have MinGW busybox _separate_ from git... Yes, you could not use the nice "ln -s busybox ash" idiom, since Windows lacks symlinks, but you could still say "busybox ash" with a relatively small, single executable. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
