Re: [PATCH 0/9] [RFC] Changed Paths Bloom Filters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 09:21:36AM -0500, Derrick Stolee wrote:

> Here are some recommendations (to Garima) for how to proceed with these
> patches. Please let me know if anyone disagrees.
> 
> >   [1/3]: commit-graph: examine changed-path objects in pack order
> 
> This one is best kept as its own patch, as it shows a clear reason why
> we want to do the sort-by-position. It would also be a complicated
> patch to include this logic along with the first use of
> compute_bloom_filters().

Yeah, I'd agree this one could be a separate patch. It does need more
work, though (as you found out, it does not cover --reachable at all).

The position counter also probably ought to be an unsigned (or even a
uint32_t, which we usually consider a maximum bound for number of
objects).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux