On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 10:39:06AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think it is a mistake to write the lower-level terminal access > code without using established libraries (or write it with a higher > level abstraction offered by scripting languages like Perl and > Pythnon), and I would personally take, given a choice between > accepting such maintenance/porting liability and dropping of > single-key behaviour, the latter in any second. I've no opinion on the implementation or maintenance work. But as a heavy user of `git add -p` with interactive.singlekey I'd like to keep this feature in Git. It makes using `git add -p` a lot more comfortable for me. Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
