On December 24, 2019 6:31 AM, Hans Jerry Illikainen wrote: > To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'SZEDER Gábor' > <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] gpg-interface: add minTrustLevel as a configuration > option > > On Mon, Dec 23 2019, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > Side question: are there any tests running with alternate GPG > > packages? I have a platform where the official GPG itself is not > > available, so am looking for alternatives for that community. > > Do you mean non-standard builds or forks of GnuPG, or alternative > implementations of PGP? I am specially looking for alterative implementations of PGP, not forks of GnuPG. GnuPG v2 introduced some dependencies that are not available on a few platforms that I support. > As it stands, the test suite is hardcoded to use gpg and gpgsm (see e.g. > t/lib-gpg.sh). For normal use, the gpg.program and gpg.<format>.program > config options can be used to override the programs to use. However, any > alternative implementation would have to mimic the behavior of GnuPG (see > gpg-interface.c -- a number of hardcoded arguments are passed in > verify_signed_buffer() and sign_buffer(), and the output from various > operations are GnuPG-specific.) Thanks, Randall
