Re: [PATCH 10/20] t5319: make test work with SHA-256

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On 23/12/2019, at 6:48 AM, brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 2019-12-22 at 00:06:47, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 2:52 PM brian m. carlson
>>> <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This test corrupts various locations in a multi-pack index to test
>>> various error responses.  However, these offsets differ between SHA-1
>>> indexes and SHA-256 indexes due to differences in object length.  Use
>>> test_oid to look up the correct offsets based on the algorithm.
>>> ---
>> 
>> Missing sign-off.
> 
> Will fix.  In the odd case that no reroll is necessary, I'll include it
> here:
> 
> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

You have a fan for your work! This is the hard work. I missed adding sign-off in my patch series also. Fixed in the branch mentioned in the email I sent to the list, about alternative SHA algorithms.

I can review this patch series if you like. I’ve applied them in my local tree and run tests. Nothing blew up...

Happy holidays.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux