On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:45 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That is exactly the point. I am not in the business of spoon > feeding answers. Why would pointing out a typo clearly to the author be considered as spoon feeding answers? Rather than simply reviewing and pointing out mistakes in a clear and a respectful way? > I want my contributors to *think*. Nobody is against *thinking*, and I'm sure an author who found an issue and implemented a fix had his/her share of thinking to get the job done. So I hope a typo is not standing in the way of acknowledging the author's effort. > Any contributor working on this topic should be competent enough to > realize/notice it once it is pointed out---even though lack of > proof-reading before sending may cause such a mistake by > carelessness. I have no reason not to believe that this is crossing the line. No matter how much a reviewer disagrees with the proposed changes, I'd appreciate keeping a mutually respectful discussion during the review process. Heba
