Re: [PATCH 4/5] Add test for sanitized work-tree behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> ...
> @@ -3,90 +3,109 @@
>  test_description='test separate work tree'
>  . ./test-lib.sh
>  
> +i=1
> +
>  test_rev_parse() {
> - ...
> +	name="$1"
> +	for option in --is-bare-repository --is-inside-git-dir \
> +		--is-inside-work-tree --show-prefix
> +	do
> +		shift
> +		test_expect_success "$name: $option" \
> +			"test '$1' = \"\$(git rev-parse $option)\""

> +i=$(($i+1))
> +test $i = $STOPI && gdb --args git rev-parse $option

Eh?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux