Re: [PATCH v3] sparse-checkout: improve OS ls compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 12:55, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It would be helpful, therefore,
> to mention such an implementation by name:
>
>     ...some 'ls' implementations, such as on FreeBSD, include...
>
> (One can, of course, always argue that the commit message can be
> consulted to learn about a particular 'ls' implementation, but then
> why have an in-code comment at all?)

It could serve as a hint to check the commit history, but fair enough
- I agree including the specific example is an improvement. I can
resend if necessary but probably that change can just be folded in?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux