Re: [PATCH 1/1] config: allow user to know scope of config options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:46:06AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> It almost makes me point fingers at config.c::config_with_options()
> where config_source is inspected and git_config_from_*() helpers are
> called without setting the current_parsing_scope.  Unlike these
> cases, when do_git_config_sequence() is called from that function,
> the scope is recorded in the variable before each standard config
> source file is opened and read.  What would we be breaking if we
> taught the function to set the current_parsing_scope variable
> correctly even when reading from the config_source?  That would
> certainly simplify this function quite a lot, but if the other parts
> of the codebase relies on the current behaviour, we cannot make such
> a change lightly.

As the author of the SCOPE enum, I think this is the right direction.
The only users of current_config_scope() are in config callbacks (e.g.,
upload_pack_config() checks it for the "packobjectshook"), which you
couldn't trigger via "git config" anyway.

The main reason I didn't set the scope before in config_with_options()
is that it's not given the scope at all; git-config resolves it to the
filename. So if git_config_source grows an enum to select the type, and
all that filename-resolution gets pushed down into config_with_options(),
the whole thing would fall out naturally, I think.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux