[PATCH v4 05/12] pack-bitmap: uninteresting oid can be outside bitmapped packfile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>

bitmap_has_oid_in_uninteresting() only used bitmap_position_packfile(),
not bitmap_position(). So it wouldn't find objects which weren't in the
bitmapped packfile (i.e., ones where we extended the bitmap to handle
loose objects, or objects in other packs).

As we could reuse a delta against such an object it is suboptimal not
to use bitmap_position(), so let's use it instead of
bitmap_position_packfile().

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 pack-bitmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pack-bitmap.c b/pack-bitmap.c
index fb4f6297f2..de65f2fc36 100644
--- a/pack-bitmap.c
+++ b/pack-bitmap.c
@@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ int bitmap_has_oid_in_uninteresting(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
 	if (!bitmap_git->haves)
 		return 0; /* walk had no "haves" */
 
-	pos = bitmap_position_packfile(bitmap_git, oid);
+	pos = bitmap_position(bitmap_git, oid);
 	if (pos < 0)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.24.1.498.g561400140f




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux