On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:08:20PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > The TTY prerequisite is a rather heavy one: it not only requires Perl to > work, but also the IO/Pty.pm module (with native support, and it > requires pseudo terminals, too). > > In particular, test cases marked with the TTY prerequisite would be > skipped in Git for Windows' SDK. > > In the case of `git add -p`, we do not actually need that big a hammer, > as we do not want to test any functionality that requires a pseudo > terminal; all we want is for the interactive add command to use color, > even when being called from within the test suite. > > And we found exactly such a trick earlier already: when we added a test > case to verify that the main loop of `git add -i` is colored > appropriately. Let's use that trick instead of the TTY prerequisite. It's much more interesting _what_ that trick is than when it was found. Is it setting TERM=vt100, or is it setting both TERM=vt100 and GIT_PAGER_IN_USE=true? I'm inclined to think the latter, but I'm not sure I interpreted the comment below right. > +# This function uses a trick to manipulate the interactive add to use color: > +# the `want_color()` function special-cases the situation where a pager was > +# spawned and Git now wants to output colored text: to detect that situation, > +# the environment variable `GIT_PAGER_IN_USE` is set. However, color is Perhaps a s/is set/has to be set/ would have helped my interpreter, dunno. > +# suppressed despite that environment variable if the `TERM` variable > +# indicates a dumb terminal, so we set that variable, too. > + > +force_color () { > + env GIT_PAGER_IN_USE=true TERM=vt100 "$@" > +} In any case, there are a couple of tests in other test scripts that test color relying on the TTY prereq. So maybe it would be worth to make this into a "global" helper function by adding it to 'test-lib-functions.sh', so we can drop a few more prereqs. OTOH, some of those other tests have descriptions like: t3203-branch-output.sh:test_expect_success TTY '%(color) present with tty' t7004-tag.sh:test_expect_success TTY '%(color) present with tty' i.e. their description is specific about checking the behaviour with a tty, so I'm not entirely sure.