On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:11:46PM -0800, Emily Shaffer wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:19:57PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > If a user is interacting with their config files primarily by the 'git > > > config' command, using the location flags (--global, --system, etc) then > > > they may be more interested to see the scope of the config file they are > > > editing, rather than the filepath. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Note: This commit has been cherry-picked out of the "configuration-based > > > hook management" topic, at > > > lore.kernel.org/git/20191210023335.49987-1-emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > It turned out that I wanted to use it for git-bugreport as well - to > > > explain the origin of the configs we are printing in the bugreport, > > > without directly exposing the user's home directory path. > > > > > > This seems to have similar work to https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/478 > > > which I believe hasn't been mailed yet; but that change is targeted > > > towards the builtin config command, rather than the config library. > > > Since I wanted to use the library, I'm sending on my own now. Maybe > > > this commit will be useful to that change's author. > > > > One thing I wondered about this in the original version was if the > > returned value should be localized. In the context of the original, > > the --porcelain mode refused to give this information in its output, > > so it was OK to always localize the returned value to satisify the > > other caller who wanted end-user-facing output. > > > > But as a more general helper, I am not sure if this is the most > > useful way to implement it. Shouldn't the function rather return > > the machine-readable tokens and allow callers to localize it as > > needed with its own _() around the returned value? I dunno. > > > Hm. I think that's a good point, and allows this helper to be used for > something silly like putting together a sample invocation to 'git > config' if desired. It's meant to mirror the scope given to 'git config' > - which makes me think that no, it shouldn't be localized, since the > argument isn't localized either. Huh. One interesting piece is that the code talks about .git/config as "repo" config, whereas 'git-config' talks about "--local". Does it make sense to teach this enum stringifier that CONFIG_SCOPE_REPO means "local"? I think CONFIG_SCOPE_REPO is used for "--worktree" too, so perhaps it's better to let "repo" mean "local or worktree". > > Ok, I'll take the locale marker off. > > - Emily
