Re: [PATCH 0/5] format-patch: improve handling of `format.notes`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:10 AM Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In this email[1], Elijah pointed out that the handling of multiple
> `format.notes` configurations could be buggy. If we had
> `format.notes = <ref1>`, `format.notes = false` and
> `format.notes = <ref2>`, the behaviour is ambiguous. This series uses
> the way `--notes=<ref1> --no-notes --notes=<ref2>` is handled as a model
> and structures the handling of `format.notes` in a similar manner,
> allowing one `format.notes = false` to override previous configs.
>
> Also, in the same email, it was pointed out that git_config() should be
> called before repo_init_revisions(). In 13cdf78094 (format-patch: teach
> format.notes config option, 2019-05-16), the order was reversed. This
> series changes it back such that git_config() is called before
> repo_init_revisions().

Sweet, thanks for working on this.  I took a very cursory glance over
the patches and didn't spot anything egregiously wrong, though I'm
also not familiar with the notes machinery.  Mostly I'm just piping up
to thank you for tackling this so quickly.  :-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux