At the top of 't6120-describe.sh' an ASCII graph illustrates the
repository's history used in this test script. This graph is a bit
misleading, because it swapped the second merge commit's first and
second parents.
When describing/naming a commit it does make a difference which parent
is the first and which is the second/Nth, so update this graph to
accurately represent that second merge.
While at it, move this history graph from the 'test_description'
variable to a regular comment.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
---
t/t6120-describe.sh | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
index 45047d0a72..9b184179d1 100755
--- a/t/t6120-describe.sh
+++ b/t/t6120-describe.sh
@@ -1,15 +1,16 @@
#!/bin/sh
-test_description='test describe
+test_description='test describe'
+
+# o---o-----o----o----o-------o----x
+# \ D,R e /
+# \---o-------------o-'
+# \ B /
+# `-o----o----o-'
+# A c
+#
+# First parent of a merge commit is on the same line, second parent below.
- B
- .--------------o----o----o----x
- / / /
- o----o----o----o----o----. /
- \ A c /
- .------------o---o---o
- D,R e
-'
. ./test-lib.sh
check_describe () {
--
2.24.0.801.g241c134b8d
