Hi Miriam, As Dscho suggests, next time please use [PATCH v2] or [PATCH v3] instead of [PATCH] if the patch has already been sent, even if the subject has changed. On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:40 AM Miriam Rubio <mirucam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Tanushree Tumane <tanushreetumane@xxxxxxxxx> > > In 5e82c3dd22a (bisect--helper: `bisect_reset` shell function in C, > 2019-01-02), the `git bisect reset` subcommand was ported to C. When the > call to `git checkout` failed, an error message was reported to the > user. > > However, this error message used the `strbuf` that had just been > released already. Let's switch that around: first use it, then release > it. Great! I think keeping Tanushree as the author and changing the commit message and the subject was the right thing to do. > Mentored-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> > Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tanushree Tumane <tanushreetumane@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Miriam Rubio <mirucam@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Here (after the line starting with "---") you can add comments about the patch. One useful comment here would be to say that this patch is a new version of https://public-inbox.org/git/20191208172813.16518-1-mirucam@xxxxxxxxx/ which itself has been sent previously by Tanushree (https://public-inbox.org/git/64117cde718f0d56ebfa4c30f4d8fe2155f5cf65.1551003074.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/). Thanks, Christian.
