On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 10:42 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>>> It could be a good idea if Peff could answer some of the comments made > >>>> by Jonathan Tan about patch 9/9. > >>>> > >>>> I have put Peff as the author of all the commits. > >>> > >>> Thanks. I think the series looks mostly good except for the questions I > >>> raised in patch 9/9, so I'll wait for Peff to respond too. > >> > >> Hmph, the round before this one has been in 'next' for quite a > >> while, so should I eject it before waiting for Peff to respond > >> before queuing this one? > > > > After rebasing these v3 patches on top of the base of the one in > > 'next', the only difference seems to be the log message of 3/9 and > > the contents of 9/9. I guess I'll mark the topic as "on hold" for > > now before doing anything, as I am officially taking a time-off most > > of this week ;-) > > So..., that week has passed---anything new? Unfortunately, no. If you want I can send an incremental change on the content of 9/9 on top of what's in next. Otherwise I can't see what I could do on this. Peff, could you tell us if you might have time to take a look at this soon?
