Re: es/pathspec-f-f-grep, was Re: am/pathspec-f-f-checkout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Oops, I was talking about `es/pathspec-f-f-grep`, not about
> `am/pathspec-f-f-checkout`, sorry for the mixup.

Thanks.  Yup, these uninitialized variables give a sign of
carelessness.  Will put on hold.

> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
>> Hi Junio & Emily,
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> > * am/pathspec-f-f-checkout (2019-12-04) 7 commits
>> >  - checkout, restore: support the --pathspec-from-file option
>> >  - doc: restore: synchronize <pathspec> description
>> >  - doc: checkout: synchronize <pathspec> description
>> >  - doc: checkout: fix broken text reference
>> >  - doc: checkout: remove duplicate synopsis
>> >  - add: support the --pathspec-from-file option
>> >  - cmd_add: prepare for next patch
>> >  (this branch uses am/pathspec-from-file; is tangled with es/pathspec-f-f-grep.)
>> >
>> >  A few more commands learned the "--pathspec-from-file" command line
>> >  option.
>> >
>> >  Will merge to 'next'.
>>
>> Gábor noticed that this breaks Travis, and I provided a patch that
>> initializes those new variables. Please squash that in before merging to
>> `next`.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux