On Tuesday 2007 July 24, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So if you sleep for one second, the filesystem times will update by one > second, but if you try to *synchronize* to exactly one second, it's not at > all certain that the *filesystem* clock will be synchronized to the same > second! Time skew is simply a fact of life. I think it's even worse; if memory serves one of the Windows file systems (spit) only stores times to a two-second resolution. So half the time, waiting for one second won't change the time stamp _at all_. Andy -- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html