Steven Grimm <koreth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... >> I am more worried about how this should interact with cases >> where you usually do not start the log message from scratch. >> For example, are there cases / policies where being able to use >> templates to leave comments on merge commits are needed? >> Squash-commits? Perhaps "apply this template but only when you >> have hand resolved a conflicting merges"? >> > > Those are all valid cases. They also happen to be ones that are not > personally useful to me; none of the stuff in my company's commit > template would really apply to merges. I'm happy to do it if you think > those cases need to be handled before this can go in, but given > there's at least one user out there who doesn't need those things, I > wonder if this makes more sense to hold off on until someone actually > asks for it. > ... > Is your hunch about the common case different than mine? Again, I can > go address this if it'll actually be useful. No, I am way more cunning and lazy than that. I did not have hunch about the common case, so I just had you (and anybody else who would join the thread) do necessary thinking and guessing for me ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
