On Wed, Nov 20 2019, Eric Wong wrote: > Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, all: >> >> I used Eric's public-inbox.org archives to set up our own copy on >> lore.kernel.org and identical list archives are now available on that >> server. > > Almost :) I forget it exists, but there's the "gmane:$ARTICLE_NUM" > altid mapping search support on my server for legacy gmane URLs. > > Instructions to set it up: > https://public-inbox.org/meta/20160811002348.9719-1-e@xxxxxxxxx/ > >> I spoke with Eric and he recommends that official project documentation >> starts using lore.kernel.org/git URLs in daily use and git's official >> documentation in order to allow him more freedom of decision when it >> comes to hosting his equipment. The URLs at both domains remain the >> same, e.g.: > > Yup, .org TLD renewal costs will likely go up and I won't pay > higher costs to keep .org domains. > > The system running public-inbox.org (and the recommended > onions(*)) will stay running and will have bleeding edge > code on it. > > > * Accessible via Tor, no need to depend on registrars: > http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/ > http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/ > http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/ I think it would make sense for the Git SFC arm of things[1] to consider taking over the public-inbox.org domain rather than letting it expire (of course contingent on your approval) and turning it into a CNAME (or other redirect) for lore.kernel.org. We have a lot of mailing list and some (~130 commits) git.git commit references to that domain. It seems like a worthwhile expense to me to pay for the renewal of it rather than having it turn into e.g. some spam landing page as the registration expires. 1. Disclaimer: I'm one of the people who'd vote on making that decision if it came to that, but this E-Mail is, as they say, just like, my opinion, man :)
