On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:19:23PM +0800, Steven Grimm wrote: > Steven Walter wrote: > >That said, I'm not sure that stgit will help you with "local versioning" > >of files (I'm not even sure what you mean). Perhaps you can elaborate > >on this point. > > > > He wants to create some files in his git-svn clone and use git to manage > them -- checkpointing his work in progress, backing out changes, etc., > without publishing those files to the svn repository. The files in > question are not already in svn. But he does want to work on other files > that *are* in the svn repository, and wants those changes to be > committed back. > > So my assumption was that he would do something like maintain his > local-only changes as StGIT patches that never get committed to git. His > other changes would get committed from StGIT to git, and from there he'd > do his normal git-svn dcommit. Or maybe git-svn dcommit followed by stg > rebase since git-svn dcommit creates new revision IDs. > > In any event, now that I know it's working successfully for at least one > person, I'll point him to stg and he can play with it a bit. Didn't want > to lead him into a dead end. Thanks! If I understand your scenario correctly, guilt will work just as well. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- All science is either physics or stamp collecting. - Ernest Rutherford - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
