Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/22/2019 2:17 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:51:56PM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> 
>> The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated
>> to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output. However, there
>> is one test in t6500-gc.sh that uses the test_terminal method. This
>> mechanism does not preserve the GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY environment variable,
>> so we need to modify check on the output. We still watch for the
>> "Enumerating objects" progress but no longer look for "Computing
>> commit graph generation numbers".
> 
> I'm still puzzled by this paragraph. If I replace the test hunk in your
> patch with this:
> 
> diff --git a/t/t6500-gc.sh b/t/t6500-gc.sh
> index 7f79eedd1c..0a69a67117 100755
> --- a/t/t6500-gc.sh
> +++ b/t/t6500-gc.sh
> @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ test_expect_success 'gc --no-quiet' '
>  '
>  
>  test_expect_success TTY 'with TTY: gc --no-quiet' '
> -	test_terminal git -c gc.writeCommitGraph=true gc --no-quiet >stdout 2>stderr &&
> +	test_terminal env GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 \
> +		git -c gc.writeCommitGraph=true gc --no-quiet >stdout 2>stderr &&
>  	test_must_be_empty stdout &&
>  	test_i18ngrep "Enumerating objects" stderr &&
>  	test_i18ngrep "Computing commit graph generation numbers" stderr
> 
> the test works fine for me.

Thanks! I was having trouble getting that to work by only
inserting "GIT_PROCESS_DELAY=0" somewhere. The added "env"
is what I was missing.

-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux