Re: Report of use of "local" per t0000-basic.sh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think it's fine that we restrict the use of local to within a
> function.  In fact, dash (Debian and Ubuntu's default /bin/sh) exits
> unsuccessfully if you use local outside of a function.

All of the above sounds quite sensible.

> Is there some place in particular that you've found we're using it
> outside of a function?  I don't know about others, but I'm certainly
> interested in fixing these.  It looks like we do use it in a function in
> t0000 itself, though.

Yup, we definitely should fix it if there is a use of "local" at the
top-level outside a function that does not make sense.  The one in
the t0000 that tests if "local" behaves the way we expect it to
looks OK to me.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux