Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] range-diff: passthrough --[no-]notes to `git log`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eric,

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 07:43:18AM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:13 PM Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:26:04PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > +#include "argv-array.h"
> > > >
> > > >  int show_range_diff(const char *range1, const char *range2,
> > > >                 int creation_factor, int dual_color,
> > > > -               struct diff_options *diffopt);
> > > > +               struct diff_options *diffopt,
> > > > +               struct argv_array *other_arg);
> > >
> > > I thought a mere use of "pointer to a struct" did not have to bring
> > > the definition of the struct into the picture?  In other words,
> > > wouldn't it be fine to leave the other_arg a pointer to an opaque
> > > structure by not including "argv-array.h" in this file?
> >
> > Without including "argv-array.h", we get the following hdr-check error:
> >
> >         $ make range-diff.hco
> >         In file included from range-diff.hcc:2:
> >         ./range-diff.h:16:14: error: declaration of 'struct argv_array' will not be visible outside of this function [-Werror,-Wvisibility]
> >                             struct argv_array *other_arg);
> 
> Did you forward-declare 'argv_array' in range-diff.h? That is, rather than:
> 
>     #include "argv-array.h"
> 
> instead say:
> 
>     struct argv_array;

*facepalm* Damn, sorry for the brainfart. I completely forgot to do
that.

That being said, I'd prefer to just include the header for consistency
since we already have the #include "diff.h" up there. Or alternatively,
I could write a patch to change both into forward-declarations.

Personally, I prefer to avoid forward-declarations whenever possible
because it adds duplication. If we have a strong preference for one or
the other, should we include it in the CodingGuidelines?

Thanks,

Denton

> 
> which tells the compiler that the type exists, thus allowing you to
> deal with pointers to the struct, as long as you don't try to access
> any of the struct's members in code which has seen only the forward
> declaration. You would still need to #include "argv-array.h" in
> range-diff.c, though.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux