Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> @@ -178,10 +178,11 @@ test_wrapper_ () {
> export test_prereq
> if ! test_skip "$@"
> then
> - base=$(basename "$0" .sh)
So we used to use $base to hold the number and the filename here
> - echo "$test_count" >>"$perf_results_dir"/$base.subtests
> - echo "$1" >"$perf_results_dir"/$base.$test_count.descr
> base="$perf_results_dir"/"$PERF_RESULTS_PREFIX$(basename "$0" .sh)"."$test_count"
and then redefined it to be the results-prefix specific one.
> + rm -f "$base".*
you now remove those results-prefix specific one for the $test_count
(I guess that is as specific you can go) before writing the count
and the description.
So this "rm -f" is a no-op when perf-results-prefix is not empty?
> + no_prefix_base="$perf_results_dir"/$(basename "$0" .sh)
> + echo "$test_count" >>$no_prefix_base.subtests
> + echo "$1" >$no_prefix_base.$test_count.descr
> "$test_wrapper_func_" "$@"
> fi
